Cycle 4 Advance Questionnaire - Board of Education
Frequency Distribution Report
HERMITAGE R-IV School District

  Strongly
Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly
Disagree
 
Question N Pct. N Pct. N Pct. N Pct. N Pct. Number
Missing
1 - The district has created specific strategies to better involve parents in the education of their child. 5 71.4 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
2 - Effective vehicles are in place for parents and community to communicate with the school. 4 57.1 3 42.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
3 - The board monitors economic and demographic trends in the community. 2 28.6 5 71.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
4 - The board has high expectations for student achievement. 6 85.7 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
5 - The board discusses student performance issues on a regular basis. 4 57.1 2 28.6 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
6 - We regularly review our progress in meeting the objectives of the CSIP. 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
7 - Our CSIP has driven improvement on the MSIP student performance indicators. 2 28.6 5 71.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
8 - The board establishes policies and permits administrators to implement these policies on a day-to-day basis. 7 100.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
9 - The community provides enough money to adequately provide quality educational programs to children. 3 42.9 3 42.9 1 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
10 - Overall, I feel our school buildings are in good condition. 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
11 - Career-Technical education is an essential part of the district's program of studies. 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
12 - The board annually reviews graduate follow-up data of graduates into post-secondary education, work and military. 4 57.1 3 42.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
13 - The board annually reviews remediation data from post-secondary institutions including: continuing education, employment, and the military. 4 57.1 3 42.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
14 - The board annually reviews the district's Annual Performance Report (APR). 5 71.4 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
15 - As a board member, I feel accountable for student achievement. 5 71.4 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
16 - Board decisions regarding district leadership impact student performance. 5 71.4 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
17 - The district's program evaluation process informs the board about program effectiveness. 4 57.1 3 42.9 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
18 - The mission of this district is clearly defined. 5 71.4 2 28.6 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
19 - There is a clear connection between CSIP goals and budgeted expenditures. 2 28.6 5 71.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
20 - The board has implemented changes as a result of our analysis of student performance data 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
21 - Our current facilities limit the district's ability to provide desired programs. 0 0.0 1 14.3 1 14.3 2 28.6 3 42.9 0
22 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Graduation rate 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
23 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Attendance 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
24 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: College placement 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
25 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Career education placement 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
26 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Advance coursework 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
27 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Career education coursework 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
28 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: ACT 2 28.6 5 71.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
29 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Discipline incidence data 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
30 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Standardized test results (MAP) 2 28.6 5 71.4 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0
31 - The board annually reviews data disaggregated for: Dropouts 3 42.9 4 57.1 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0

Data Collected in Fall, 2006
Tables Generated January 05, 2007